Research Methodologies in Business

To improve study design and insight, examine the main distinctions and uses of mixed-methods,
quantitative, and qualitative research in business studies.

Research Methodologies in Business: Understanding the Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed-Methods Approaches

Published 19th March 2025

Introduction

This has been a debate between quantitative and qualitative research methodologies in business studies for several years. Researchers have for a long time discussed which of the two approaches is most appropriate for investigating business phenomena.

Some people say that quantitative methods give generalizable results while others praise the depth and contextual richness of qualitative methodologies. Recently, however, mixed-methods research has appeared as a way of combining the best features of both approaches and, thus, providing a more holistic view.

This article looks at the key findings from the research on methodological preferences in business studies, the increasing importance of mixed methodologies, and the need for balance in global business research. As a result, students, researchers, and scholars will be able to make more informed decisions when designing their own studies based on these research methodologies.

1. The Ongoing Debate: Quantitative vs. Qualitative Approaches

1.1 Historical Divide in Business Research

Since the 1980s, researchers have been discussing the advantages and disadvantages of quantitative and qualitative methodologies (Antwi & Hamza, 2015; Onwuegbuzie, 2005). Each side has argued strongly:

Quantitative researchers have paid attention to statistical reliability, generality and predictive modelling [1].
Qualitative researchers have emphasized context, in-depth understanding, and narrative richness.

Despite these debates, it is now taken as given that both methodologies have their strengths and that their application should be dependent on research questions and objectives.

2. Quantitative Methodologies in Business Research

2.1 Prevalence of Quantitative Approaches

Hanson and Grimmer (2007) examined methodological trends in business marketing research and found that:

Quantitative methodologies are most prominent in business research because of their effectiveness in working with large data sets and identifying generalization across cases [2].
Scholars employ statistical modeling, surveys, and regression analysis to determine market trends, consumer behavior, and economic forecasts [2].

2.2 The Justification for Quantitative Research

Researchers often choose quantitative methods because they:

Offer precise, quantifiable, and statistically sound outcomes.
Enable researchers to examine large numbers of participants in a relatively short time.
Are important for predictive analysis and decision-making models.

However, some scholars argue that an over reliance on quantitative methodologies can result in shallow understanding of key contextual and cultural factors within business research.

3. The Role of Qualitative Research in Business Studies

3.1 Growing Recognition of Qualitative Research

According to Birkinshaw et al. (2011), there is a need to employ qualitative methodologies in global business research because:

Quantitative studies are often unable to fully reflect the dynamics of real business interactions [3].
Many business phenomena are best studied on a close, specific context which qualitative research can offer [3].
The preponderance of quantitative methodologies in international business research has resulted in missing knowledge gaps in areas such as knowledge transfer and cross-cultural collaboration [3].

3.2 Case Studies and Contextual Research

Case studies and ethnographic research help scholars to place business strategies within cultural and organisational contexts.
Qualitative approaches are especially useful for investigating leadership styles, corporate ethics and consumer psychology.

Birkinshaw et al. (2011) argue that qualitative research should complement quantitative methods, rather than being overlooked in favor of numerical generalizations.

4. The Rise of Mixed-Methods Research in Business

4.1 Perceived Value of Mixed-Methods Approaches

As reported by McKim (2017), a study conducted on graduate students’ understanding of research methods uncovered that:

Students consider mixed-methods research to be the most sophisticated one [4].

Students felt that the use of both qualitative and quantitative methods would enable practitioners to fully capture the essence of the business world [4].

4.2 Mixed-Methods Bridging the Gap

According to Krivokapic-Skoko and O’Neill (2011), the use of mix-methods business research is becoming increasingly popular because they:

Combine quantitative data with qualitative understanding for more complex evaluations [5].
Are more accommodating in terms of research design [5].
Facilitate the blending of both qualitative and quantitative research [5].

4.3 Innovative Mixed-Methods Approaches

The authors further posited that business researchers might focus on new mixed method designs such as:

Quantitative Case Study—effectively quantifying narrative case studies.
Hermeneutic Content Analysis—merging interpreting text with the logic of classification.
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) – case comparison based on set-theoretic concepts.
Event Structure Analysis—analyzing the sequence of business choices and relations.
Q Methodology—a combination of two or more approaches to study phenomena in organizations with different perspectives.

Business scholars may be able to greatly enhance their research by integrating these advanced mixed methods designs.

5. Global Business Research: Methodological Challenges and Opportunities

5.1 Addressing the Limitations of Quantitative Research in Global Business

According to Birkinshaw et al. (2011), the field of global business neglects the qualitative approach, and this is why certain business practices are done inaccurately.

For instance, in quantitative studies, the Japanese kaizen philosophy of continuous improvement is usually oversimplified to modernize its interpretation [6].
Cross-cultural research must acknowledge and incorporate qualitative perspectives to accurately represent knowledge exchange and technology transfer [6].

5.2 The Importance of Contextual Analysis

To gain insight into how businesses operate globally, researchers are required to:

Perform qualitative studies for business and culture ethnography.
Implement research that is combined to facilitate statistical data to corresponding realities.
Not consider all business activities too generalized without taking into account more specific contextual variables.

6. Choosing the Right Research Methodology for Business Studies

6.1 Key Considerations for Business Researchers

Students and researchers should consider the following when selecting a research methodology:

What is the research objective?

In case the purpose is to examine hypotheses and analyze market patterns, quantitative research is appropriate.
When the objective is to study organizational culture or business decision-making, qualitative research might be more appropriate.
If both contextual understanding and statistical analysis are needed, a mixed-methods approach is optimal.

What data is available?

If large datasets are accessible, quantitative methods may be easier to implement.
If in-depth, firsthand observations are required, qualitative approaches should be considered.

What is the academic or industry expectation?

Some business disciplines favor quantitative research (e.g., finance, economics).
Others encourage qualitative insights (e.g., leadership studies, business ethics).

6.2 Moving Toward a Holistic Research Approach

Instead of viewing methodologies as competing approaches, scholars should recognize that they complement each other.
The increasing acceptance of mixed-methods research provides an opportunity to develop more well-rounded business insights.

Conclusion: Embracing Methodological Diversity in Business Research

Business research requires a balanced and flexible approach to methodology selection. While quantitative methods provide generalizable insights, qualitative research offers deep, contextual understanding. Mixed methods approach bridges the gap, allowing for a more comprehensive perspective.

To advance business scholarship, researchers should:

Recognize the strengths and limitations of each methodology.
Apply innovative mixed-methods techniques to enrich their findings.
Ensure that context and cultural dynamics are considered in global business studies.

By embracing methodological diversity, business scholars can enhance the quality of research, making valuable contributions to both academic literature and real-world business practices.

To access our services and discuss your requirements with our experts, please contact us today